As usual Obama blamed past President Bush at least eight times, by my count, during his defiant and disorganized  speech last night. And he lied to the Congress and the viewing public by claiming he saved 2 million jobs while unemployment went up by more than 3 million jobs lost during his “reign” as POTUS! But then who can refute him or prove that he was correct?

We are Fighting a Religious Holy War Even If We are No Longer A Religious Country

Despite the fact that Secretary" Incompetano"refuses to use the words, "war on terror", and instaed refers to the fight we are in as a criminal civil action. We are and have been for nine years a war with radical Muslim terrorists!

The people we fight have a religious perversion that they must convert all peoples to their brand of religion or kill them!

World War II was fought for an identifiable cause. To defeat the tyranny of the Japanese Empire and the Nazi regime that Hitler began.

Korea and Vietnam were fought to stop the spread of Communism in the Far East, and when we fought these wars the Country's attitude toward war had been radically changed by the liberal press and the University intelligencia.

During these wars the public became more aware of the results of waging war, such as collateral damage and the number of Americans killed in battle. Of course death is a consequence of fighting a war, but the Country must have the will to accept casualties on both sides if they expect our forces to win the war.Political Correctness and "rules of engagement" won't win the war!


One axiom, however, can be applied equally to all our past wars up until recently; war means fighting and fighting means killing. Or, as Civil War General William Tecumseh Sherman once unapologetic said, "If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war, and not popularity seeking."

Americans, like other warriors of days past, rarely felt squeamish about killing the enemy, even when they were other Americans -- whether they be "native" or Southern.For the most part, our ancestors knew that war was a hard business and fought it that way. Theirs was a war of the head. A war where one and all accepted the dreaded but necessary fact that people would die, even if some of those people never raised a hand in anger.Thus we developed the phrase: "collateral damage".

If Eisenhower had worried about people dying he would never have invaded Europe, and never would have ordered the "fire bombing" of Dresden, Hamburg and Berlin. His orders and objective was to win the war!

The loss of life when American Marines took Iwo Jima was over 7,000 Marines and 20,000 Japanese. The planners of this 37 day battle knew there was going to be a huge loss of life, but to spare the hundreds of thousands of soldiers and Marines who would have been killed in an invasion of Japan made it worth while.

Today we have a "hangover" of the attitude developed by the liberal press and peacenicks that wining is not the important objective. Saving lives is always important, but it should not dictate how our troops fight, and whether we win or put out tail between our legs and withdraw.

This Country has found a way to move away from the religious purpose of our Founding Fathers, and has reduced almost all vestiges of religion from public life. Despite this we are in a religious war whether we recognize it or not.

The Islamic radicals that are daily waging war against us "infidels" are doing so for the sole purpose of destroying "The Great Satan" and establishing a worldwide "caliphate" where Sharia law rules.

For those who refuse to believe this is a religious war I say to them if not then why are the leaders, like Osama bin Laden, calling upon the religious fervor of all the suicide bombers?

Unless Americans wake up and accept the fact that we are in a struggle to the death with religious fanatics we will certainly lose this war as we did Vietnam. Do we make war to win?
C.S. Lewis made an appropriate statement that I will quote with thanks to "The New Media Journal".


"In the [Leftist] society the number of pacifists will either be large enough to cripple the state as a belligerent, or not,” Lewis warned, “If it is large enough, then you have handed over the state which does tolerate pacifists to its totalitarian neighbor who does not. Pacifism of this kind is taking the straight road to a world in which there will be no pacifists."

Walks like a duck and quacks,it is duck !    Lets all accept the accept the fact that since Obama President all attacks upon Americans were committed by radical Muslims who were mostly either Arabs or Blacks in face color.   The most notable incidents were at Fort Hood, last week on an airplane bound for Detroit, Mohammed Jabarah, January 2008. Mohammad Jabarah was involved in plots to bomb U.S. embassies in Singapore and the Philippines and mass transit frequented by U.S. military personnel. He was convicted of filming U.S., Australian, and Israeli embassies and conducting surveillance of U.S. warships. He is suspected of training in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and spending time with Osama bin Laden. Jabarah was arrested in 2002 by Omani police and was later transferred to American custody. In January 2008, Jabarah was sentenced to life in prison after pleading guilty to terrorism charges.[55]


Hassan Abujihaad, March 2008. Hassan Abujihaad, a former U.S. Navy sailor from Phoenix, Arizona, was convicted of supporting terrorism and disclosing classified information, including the location of Navy ships and their vulnerabilities to Azzam Publications, a London organization that provided material support and resources to terrorists. Abujihaad was arrested in March 2007 and pleaded not guilty to charges of supporting terrorism in April 2007. In May 2008, he was convicted by a jury and sentenced to 10 years in prison.[56]

Christopher Paul, June 2008. Christopher Paul is a U.S. citizen from Columbus, Ohio. He joined al-Qaeda in the 1990s and was involved in conspiracies to target Americans in the United States and overseas. In 1999, he became connected to an Islamic terrorist cell in Germany, where he was involved in a plot to target Americans at foreign vacation resorts. He later returned to Ohio and was subsequently arrested for conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, specifically explosive devices, "against targets in Europe and the United States." Paul pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to 20 years in prison.[57]

Synagogue Terror Plot, May 2009. On May 20, 2009, the New York Police Department announced the arrest of James Cromite, David Williams, Onta Williams, and Laguerre Payen for plotting to blow up area Jewish centers and shoot down planes at a nearby Air National Guard Base.[58] The four had attempted to gain access to Stinger missiles and were caught in the act of placing bombs in the buildings and in a car. (The bombs were duds, because undercover agents sold them fake explosives as part of an ongoing sting operation). All four men have pleaded not guilty.[59]
And yet the Obama administration refuses to use the words WAR on  Terrorism, or use the words Radical Extremeists!

They have no compunction to call TEA Party attendees, or Bible carrying Christians, Gulf War veterans
potential terrorists!
It is past time that we stop listening to CAIR that refuses to renounce the Muslim Radical Terrorists,but influencence the public dialouge ,and the Obama Administration  and the Congress.
The Administration also needs to continue to make combating terrorism an international effort. The U.S. cannot afford to leave our allies behind because America will not be safe without their cooperation.[62] These allies are key not only to U.S. security interests, but also as trade partners.

Congress plays a substantial role in developing and sustaining America's counterterrorism abilities. Reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act and FISA will require congressional support. FISA authorizes electronic surveillance within certain legal limits. The PATRIOT Act facilitates inter agency cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies in information sharing and terrorism investigations, and it established mechanisms for conducting surveillance of modern technologies, such as cell phones.[66] Key sections of these vital terrorism-fighting tools will expire this year.

Unless we do these pro-active measures we will continue to have Terrorist terror attacks on U.S. soil and our foreign assets! We have been warned by Osama.
"All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies….

So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.

bin Laden spoke those words in 2004.

And in a tape released four days before the attempted destruction of the Detroit-bound Northwest plane, the leader of al Qaeda in Yemen boasted of what was planned for Americans, saying, "We are carrying a bomb to hit the enemies of God."

Many of our readers will spend today squashed into airport queues slowed to a snail's pace by extra security measures. It will be a teeth-grindingly boring ordeal. But it will not be terrifying, unlike the experience of looking up from your in-flight movie to see flames bursting out of the leg of a passenger who is trying to murder you. On Christmas Day, Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab very nearly managed to blow up a transatlantic airliner over Detroit. The authorities at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport allowed Abdul Mutallab to carry his syringe, liquid and powder on board. Suddenly, all that fuss about a thimbleful of perfume does not seem over the top.

For passengers wondering why, yet again, the journey from check-in to departure lounge is a taste of hell on earth, the answer is straightforward. Religious terrorists are plotting to inflict on us a permanent state of earthly hell: airliners dropping from the skies, dirty bombs in shopping malls and cities, all leading to an Islamic caliphate whose totalitarian writ would run from Mecca to Milton Keynes. Was it coincidence that the attack took place on December 25? Of course not: this was an attempt to destroy the peaceful feast day of a Christian religion that the bomber despises.

 SOURCE: LONDON TELEGRAPH

Related Articles

• Barack Obama should listen to America on Guantanamo

• Don't fall for the Islamist letter, Barack Obama

• Mumbai attacks: How young Britons are radicalised in Pakistan

The British public is not so stupid as to think that most Muslims approve of Islamist terrorism: of course they do not. Moreover, although Muslims in opinion polls frequently express a preference for living in an Islamic state, only a small percentage share the jihadist fanaticism that inspired the airline bomber. Yet the awkward fact remains: of that percentage, a worrying number have lived in Britain and especially London. Some have studied at our universities: Abdul Mutallab graduated in mechanical engineering from University College London in 2008.

Over the past decade, institutes of higher education in London have consistently provided sanctuary for Islamist students who parrot the hate-filled rhetoric of al-Qaeda and its allies. Again and again, speakers have been invited and rooms provided so that, in the name of free speech, vulnerable students can be indoctrinated. Some of those students may now be sitting in caves in Waziristan or cafés in the Yemen devising methods of killing Westerners. Perhaps they picked up their expertise in a British university laboratory. We may never know until it is too late.

WHO THE STIMULUS CASH HAS REALLY HELPED!

Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” —Ronald Reagan

The number of federal workers earning six-figure salaries has exploded during the recession, according to a USA TODAY analysis of federal salary data.

Federal employees making salaries of $100,000 or more jumped from 14% to 19% of civil servants during the recession’s first 18 months ? and that’s before overtime pay and bonuses are counted.

Federal workers are enjoying an extraordinary boom time in pay and hiring during a recession that has cost 7.3 million jobs in the private sector.

The highest-paid federal employees are doing best of all on salary increases. Defense Department civilian employees earning $150,000 or more increased from 1,868 in December 2007 to 10,100 in June 2009, the most recent figure available.

When the recession started, the Transportation Department had only one person earning a salary of $170,000 or more. Eighteen months later, 1,690 employees had salaries above $170,000.

The trend to six-figure salaries is occurring throughout the federal government, in agencies big and small, high-tech and low-tech. The primary cause: substantial pay raises and new salary rules.

“There’s no way to justify this to the American people. It’s ridiculous,” says Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, a first-term lawmaker who is on the House’s federal workforce subcommittee.

Jessica Klement, government affairs director for the Federal Managers Association, says the federal workforce is highly paid because the government employs skilled people such as scientists, physicians and lawyers. She says federal employees make 26% less than private workers for comparable jobs.
For Obama and his comrades, this isn’t about creating jobs, or they wouldn’t be hoarding so much of the “stimulus” money for purposes of “buying” the upcoming national elections. It isn’t about getting everyone health insurance. It’s about leveling the economic playing field by lowering the common denominator and spreading the misery. It’s about evening the score. It’s about power, i.e., who makes the decisions over how our money is to be spent.

Obama Democrats believe that they know better than we do how our money ought to be spent and that they have a superior moral right to our money. They might even recognize that supply side economics works — just as they know capital gains tax reductions generate more revenues. But to them, the free market isn’t fair because winners and losers are determined, not by the government, but by other factors, including people’s raw efforts. They believe that economic “fairness” — or “economic justice,” a good old Jane Fonda/Tom Hayden/Marxist phrase — should be dictated from the top down by government officials and bureaucrats.

As David Limbaugh so aptly said it: “For Obama and his comrades, this isn’t about creating jobs, or they wouldn’t be hoarding so much of the “stimulus” money for purposes of “buying” the upcoming national elections. It isn’t about getting everyone health insurance. It’s about leveling the economic playing field by lowering the common denominator and spreading the misery. It’s about evening the score. It’s about power, i.e., who makes the decisions over how our money is to be spent.

Obama Democrats believe that they know better than we do how our money ought to be spent and that they have a superior moral right to our money. They might even recognize that supply side economics works — just as they know capital gains tax reductions generate more revenues. But to them, the free market isn’t fair because winners and losers are determined, not by the government, but by other factors, including people’s raw efforts. They believe that economic “fairness” — or “economic justice,” a good old Jane Fonda/Tom Hayden/Marxist phrase — should be dictated from the top down by government officials and bureaucrats.

So the answer to the unemployment crisis is to put millions on the government payroll instead of stimulating the private free enterprise system.This promotes the socialization of America, and w must stop him by regaining power in 2010!